Philosophy and Law

My philosophical grounding follows the natural law tradition as revived through the Austrian school—reason applied to human action.

Murray Rothbard extended Ludwig von Mises’ praxeology into ethics and jurisprudence, showing that liberty is not a preference but a logical consequence of human nature.  Hans-Hermann Hoppe advanced this reasoning through argumentation ethics, demonstrating that the very act of debate presupposes self-ownership and non-aggression.  To deny them is to contradict oneself.

My work continues this path: law rooted in truth, not authority.  Justice grounded in natural law and property, not decree.  Natural law is not mystical—it is the structure of reality discoverable through reason.

Economics

My economic foundation is Austrian.

Mises defined economics as the study of human action—purposeful choice under scarcity.  Rothbard united economics with ethics, restoring the link between value, ownership, and the individual.  Hoppe completed the framework by showing that property and argumentation share the same logical foundation.

I apply this method beyond economics: to policy, governance, and social order—wherever human choice collides with power.

Psychology

My psychological framework draws from Nietzsche and Carl Jung, who examined the unseen forces that shape human action.

Nietzsche exposed the conflict within man —the tension between the individual and the herd.  Jung uncovered the architecture of the psyche: the shadow, the archetype, and the process of individuation.

Together they show that freedom is not only political or economic—it is psychological.  Man cannot act freely until he confronts what governs him from within.

My work connects this inner psychology to outer systems, showing how collective illusions, fear, and imitation corrupt both markets and morals.  The study of power begins in the mind.

Writing Style

My writing draws from Rothbard’s clarity and Nietzsche’s intensity.

Rothbard wrote with the precision of logic.  Nietzsche, with the sharpness of vision.  Both rejected conformity and wrote to expose rather than persuade.

I write in the same spirit—concise, direct, and uncompromising.  Each sentence must carry meaning.  Every paragraph must move the reader toward understanding or expose falsehood.  The goal is not decoration but revelation.

Synthesis

My work stands where ideas meet consequences—where economics, law, psychology, and philosophy converge.

The thinkers I follow shared one principle: truth is not created by consensus or power.  It is discovered by reason and defended through courage.  My contribution lies in extending that principle to modern systems—the power, economic, and social machinery that governs human action today.